Amplifying Feedback

Nine feedback cycles driving global heating

Global heating is causing more global heating.

Here are nine “self-amplifying feedback cycles” driving this heating. These cycles are “self-reinforcing, circular chains of cause-and-effect”, like the “permafrost feedback cycle”.


The permafrost feedback

Higher air temperatures More melting of permafrost
More greenhouse heatingMore methane & CO2 in the air

If this feedback dominated, we would see: (1) higher air temperatures, causing (2) more melting of permafrost (ice containing frozen plant & animal matter), causing (3) more decay of thawing organic matter, releasing (4) more carbon dioxide & methane into the atmosphere, causing (5) more greenhouse heating, causing (6) higher air temperatures, and then (7) the cycle repeats.

This permafrost feedback alone could wreck our climate. Permafrost contains vast amounts of carbon, about 1.6 times more than is already in our atmosphere.

It’s concerning that measurements show increases in every element of this feedback:

These increases indicate that permafrost feedback is active and may already be self-sustaining and irreversible. We cannot tell if it’s self-perpetuating now because it is supported by:

  • human emissions of carbon dioxide and methane, &
  • other feedback cycles, which are also increasing global temperatures. (I describe eight more of these feedback cycles on this page.)

Humans are playing with fire by continuing to fuel these feedback cycles, and the critical question is whether humans can stop this dangerous amplification of global heating.

For more information on methane, refer to the methane feedback cycle on this website.



The ice cover feedback

Higher air temperatures

Less Ice Cover

Less sunlight reflected & More absorption of sunlight

This dynamic also threatens our climate. One thing in its favour is that it is reversible and could amplify cooling, if cooling occurred; see below.

See the dwindling Arctic sea ice on this website.


These causal linkages are tendencies.

The cause-and-effect linkages in these feedbacks are tendencies or likely outcomes. External events often disrupt the links in these feedback cycles, preventing the feedback from becoming dominant. For example, with “less ice cover”, the Arctic would normally “absorb more heat from the sun”; however, after a volcanic eruption, volcanic ash could reduce the sunlight reaching the Arctic, and the Arctic would NOT “absorb more heat”.


The water vapour feedback

Higher air temperatures(a) Warmer air can hold more water vapour & (b) More evaporation
More greenhouse heatingMore water vapour in the air

When this vicious cycle is dominant, (1) increased global air temperatures cause two things: (2a) they increase the air’s capacity to hold water vapour, and (2b) they cause more water to evaporate from the oceans. This (3) greatly increases the water vapour in the air, and as water vapour is a greenhouse gas, this (4) increases global air temperatures, and then (5) the cycle repeats.

This cycle is reversible, as global cooling would reduce atmospheric water vapour, but we are far from seeing any global cooling.

This feedback is also fast-moving, because changing the air temperature immediately changes the amount of water vapour the air can hold.

(Climate Change: Now or Never: New Scientist: 24 Apr 2021: page 37).


The phytoplankton feedback

Higher air temperaturesMore ocean surface heating
More carbon dioxide in the airLess nutrient up-welling
Less photosynthesis & Less carbon sinking to the ocean floorReduced phytoplankton population

See the heating of the ocean surface and the phytoplankton feedback cycle on this website.


The ocean CO2 feedback

Higher temperaturesHigher ocean temperatures
More CO2 in the atmosphere Ocean can hold less CO2

See section “Ocean CO2 feedback” on the “Temperature & CO2” page on this site websites


The forest fire feedback

Higher air temperaturesMore heat & drought
More carbon dioxide in the airMore forest fires

See fires intensifying climate change on this website


The ice-darkening feedback

Higher air temperaturesMore melting of the ice sheet surface
Less sunlight reflectionMore dark matter on the ice surface

When this feedback dominates you see: (1) higher global temperatures cause (2) more ice sheet melting, which exposes (3) more dark matter on the ice surface, like ash from distant bush fires that was previously buried in the glacier, which (4) reduces the reflection of sunlight from the ice, back into outer-space, causing (5) higher global temperatures, and then (6) the cycle repeats.


The glacier altitude feedback

More glacial surface melting

A drop in the altitude of the glacier surface

A rise in the average temperature at the glacier surface

This feedback occurs because the average temperature at the top of a mountain is lower than at sea level. This is relevant because we have some deep ice sheets, such as those in Antarctica, which can reach depths of up to 4.9 kilometres.

See Glaciers in Retreat on this website.


The populist politics feedback

Higher air temperaturesMore extreme weather
Less climate actionMore conflict over land, water, food & housing
More populist politicsMore migration

See the right-wing populism feedback cycle on this website.


Feedback that could limit global heating


The Arctic cooling feedback

The above “Arctic heating feedback” is reversible. It would become the “Arctic cooling feedback” and amplify cooling if cooling occurred.

Lower air temperatures

More Ice Cover

More sunlight reflected & Less absorption of sunlight

The current exceptionally high levels of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere mean we are unlikely to experience any global cooling. Therefore, we are unlikely to see any amplification of global cooling.

Other global heating feedback cycles are also reversible, e.g., the water vapour feedback. Some feedback cycles are not reversible, e.g., the methane release feedback.


The amplification of climate action

Here is a feedback cycle that could amplify climate action in Australia and thereby help limit global heating.

More popularity for the superpower vision
More benefits More progress toward the vision

In this feedback, (1) the increasing popularity of the vision of “Australia as a renewable energy superpower” tends to (2) increase progress towards that vision, which tends to (3) increase the resulting benefits, which tends to (4) increase the popularity of the superpower vision, and (5) the cycle repeats.

Focusing on the feedback cycles that amplify global heating can be demoralising. It can be more energising to focus on positives, like this “amplification of climate action feedback”, which could propel Australia towards an attractive future. For more on this, see:


No effective resistance to the current heating

James Lovelock (“The Revenge of Gaia”: 2006: page 35) writes that the observed rate of global warming is a grave concern. This rate suggests that no global climate dynamic will effectively resist the current warming and limit temperature increases, thereby keeping the environment safe for life as we know it.

Lovelock points out that the levels of methane and CO2 in the atmosphere in 2006 were comparable to those caused by natural releases of these gases fifty-five million years ago. At this time, temperatures rose by 5 to 8 degrees Celsius, with consequences that lasted for approximately 200,000 years.

There is no evidence of a climate dynamic emerging to limit temperature increases.


The danger of global heating amplification

Feedback cycles can produce exponential growth, e.g., the feedback you often get when a person is talking into a megaphone: a slight hum rapidly turns into a painful shriek. Also, the above global heating feedback cycles reinforce one another, each adding to the heating and threatening our nurturing climate. These cycles threaten self-perpetuating, exponential increases in global temperatures. A critical danger is that:

  • One of these heating feedback cycles becomes dominant, leading to a cascade of the other heating feedbacks becoming dominant,
  • These self-perpetuating dynamics increase global temperatures with increasing rapidity,
  • The heating releases vast amounts of greenhouse gases,
  • Humans cannot counter this heating as (1) stopping the use of fossil fuels only stops one source of carbon dioxide and does not decrease the levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and (2) geoengineering will not match the global scale of the many heating feedbacks, &
  • The heating destroys our nurturing environment.

We have co-evolved with our climate, so our current climate system suits human beings and the rich diversity of life on our planet. We must protect our climate system because global heating threatens our current climate, the global economy, political stability, human health, and the environment.


Systems theory & feedback

Feedback is a long-established concept central to “Systems Theory”. See my pages:



Loaded 2014. Updated 7 March 2026

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.